Posted 06/21/2022 06:00
(Credit: Xeno Veloso / Disclosure)
It was in 1985, early on, that filmmaker Silvio Tendler needed a CT scan at the Santa Casa da Mesicardia in Rio, equipped with a single device for that purpose. This device was donated by the government. Service, hospital and the best equipment are at the tip of the director’s tongue when dealing with the latest film: documentary. Health is treatable. “My mother was a doctor, and, due to her retirement, she never became a part of SUS. She died in 1995, and SUS was just created. She was a doctor in the public health system: I always did. Have seen the ideal treatment, “he observes. Highlighting the plots of love, competence and professionalism, Tendler also knows the reverse side of the coin: “Of course there are many problems in SUS, and there is no point in covering the sun with a sieve. But, with that. Too bad, too bad without it. “
The subject of health has long been a part of the director’s cinematography, who has already made such films. The poison is on the table. (2011), on pesticides, and Family-sized agriculture: an alternative to agribusiness (2014). Throughout his life, psychologist Palo Neymar Source, the brother of the architect Oscar, was instrumental in Tendulkar’s health care during the 1980’s. And before being counted among the richest private photo collections in the country with over 80,000 units, Tendler won the JK Medal – JK Centenary (awarded by MinC in 2003) or even the TV Direction. Prior to that, he had strained his relationship with Brasília. Brasilia and the DF secretaries are playing culture and sports.
At age 72, Tendler reaffirmed his commitment to tackling the principles of romance and extinction in films, including political panels on topics such as privatization, the financial system, barriers to social justice, popular culture and ancestral knowledge. To be promoted. . Needless to say, the professor and historian Tendler also addressed on-screen icons such as JK, Gingo, Marighela, Ferreira Geller and Carlos Zefero.
Interview // Silvio Tendler
What are the most harmful ingredients when it comes to dismantling the Unified Health System?
There is a chronic lack of funding for the SUS issue. SUS is one of the most beautiful public health projects in the world and, of course, the least funded, even though it works in a beautiful way, it has never had adequate resources. It was as if malicious action had been taken against the construction of the SUS to uproot the population, as if they did not want it to happen. And they present everything as if the population is rebelling against it, and demanding its destruction. I’ll give you an example: the thing you find most in the media is people complain about the quality of care, how many hours you spend in line at the hospital to get care or More than that, the months and years you spend in line. One way to get appointment time is, therefore, the most detrimental factor: to try to prevent SUS from succeeding, that it is the concrete reality of the dream of the generation that made it, especially those users. For those who want quality health. There is a cure for healthThat’s exactly what the film represents: recognizing the importance of SUS and the need to respect it. The epidemic has shown the importance of SUS and now we need to move on to the second stage. Reorganize the SUS, fund its activities, create resources, and review the administrative structure so that the population will love and recognize it – as it did during the epidemic.
What is the decisive factor in the efforts of SUS employees?
The commitment of SUS employees and the social structure has not only been recognized by me but also by the Brazilian population as a whole. We have all seen that without SUS, the tragedy that claimed the lives of nearly 700,000 people would have been much more serious had it not been for the efforts of these employees. So I think SUS has proved its worth. SUS employees are more than we can imagine: a huge complex. We recognize many innovative activities, including UPA, hospitals and doctors. What we don’t know is that SUS trains people: there are schools, research centers and vaccine production. SUS is very complex and extensive. She has recently performed almost like an orchestra: everyone was appreciated and recognized. You have people from all walks of life wearing lab coats. This is a very important thing. I’m sure SUS will have the necessary funding because, now the population is more vigilant. It will start charging, and SUS will leave criticism, complaint pages and rights claims pages. We will manage to change the image of the past, which still exists today, and we will have the SUS we want.
Your career is very complicated – is there a way to combine interests?
I think you can have aesthetically different periods, styles and themes. Work is never linear. There are people who keep a group of my films thematically in their memories, but I have many things that go beyond the biographies of the three presidents: Bani JK in 1980, Jango in 1984, and still By Tancredo Neves (2011). In the 1980’s, I did. The magical world of Trapalhões (1981), which brings the data of one of the largest groups of Brazilian comedians with the largest box office in cinema. I have Steel memory Which relates to the national history of the national steel industry. I have a film about a poet called Castro Elvis (1999), a film about a revolutionary who ماریگھیلا. One of the scientist Osvaldo Cruz, about the geographer Milton Santos (2016). My work is far more complex than people know.
Are you still interested in politics?
Currently, I am making a film about Lionel Bresola, a politician who always dreamed of becoming the President of the Republic, he could not fulfill his dream, but I told the historical panel Yes, many of them are covered. All of this is more complicated than trying to present yourself as a biographer of the presidents of the republic. I got this criticism in the past only for talking about the upper floors, but I have a lot of films that have very wide and different themes. I treat the biographies of the presidents of the republic with the same love. As far as the future is concerned, I think we really need renewal in politics and training of new generations. I really miss the politicians I’ve worked with. I think leadership training is becoming more and more rare. And I am terrified of the management and governance of Brazil, with the epidemic we are facing. let’s go.
Was there room for learning in the new film?
How many people were treated in the 5,000 municipalities of the whole of Brazil who were treated at the height of Covid 19? How many received in ICU? How many people were saved from the struggle of SUS employees, and who often worked in inhumane conditions? That’s the decent thing to do, and it should end there. Today, 70% of the Brazilian population is vaccinated to a second dose and, a little less, to a third: everyone is helped for free by the structure – this is solid evidence of SUS’s work. Homeless people were airlifted by helicopter for treatment. Concretely, I give the familiar number. When a massacre and irresponsible operation took place, in which there was a lack of oxygen in Manaus, the mobilization of national mobilization, not just of SUS, did much to save lives in the Amazon and inland areas along the river. I can only answer you: Long live SUS.
Is it all just a celebration?
When you get involved in something I’ve just done, I think the best thing – and I’ve been doing it since the beginning of my career – is not to paint a white plate. One should never try to hide the realm of problems – it’s all about exposing, revealing. I think the worst tribute you can pay to a person, for example, is to believe that he is a guardian, that he is exempt from any kind of criticism. In the case of the new film, it was no different: I interviewed people who spoke well and those who spoke badly. I think the debate is important: raising questions to improve the quality and performance of SUS. Everything ends my work as a documentary filmmaker. I’m not a publicist: I don’t have to hide the fact to advertise a product. I have to tell the truth, I have to deal with reality.
Which characters marked you? There is a cure for health?
Every character in the film is very rich and always highly respected. This is from a patient who has been admitted to the hospital’s emergency room on the verge of death, and is performing a Forró dance in the ward, with the doctor accompanying him. This, for me, is a very moving scene. Here is a scene from a black doctor, Jurima Warnak, who is representing the general amnesty in Brazil today. She tells her mother’s story – she talks about being a porter at her father’s Air Force Hospital – and how she didn’t have the right to use the hospital. Her mother had a stroke and was treated with aspirin, by a doctor. Her mother dies, and Jurima becomes a doctor and fights for public health in Brazil. The film is a constant struggle: Rio Grande dosell is a boy with a spinal cord injury, and his treatment is completely free – even if he gets medicine and he is alive. Thanks to I think the balance is very positive.
There is a cure for health
Sylvie Tender’s documentary about the Unified Health System. Free access to: https: //youtu.be/b-kZMfwvKsM