TRT-2 approves revision of health aid for magistrates and waives the right of civil servants


06/22/2022 – Writing

The Center demands that the health of judges is not more valuable than the health of workers.

The special body of TRT-2, in its session on the 13th, approved a change in the cost of health care for magistrates, which would be calculated at 6% (six per cent) of the Alternative Judge’s Allowance. The decision was taken in an administrative appeal by Amatra-2 (Association of Magistrates) against the decision of the court president, which had rejected the petition filed by him. The Regional College, however, dismissed the employees as beneficiaries of the move.

Was the basis and decision of the petition. CNJ Resolution No. 294/2019Which sets a limit for these beneficiaries to benefit from medical aid up to 10% on magistrates’ subsidy, subject to availability of budget. The Regional College did not pay attention to this fact, however, as a rule, the maximum limit for government employees is 10% of the alternative judge’s allowance, so that there is no basis for possible discrimination.

Although budget allocations for TRT-2 and the presence of surpluses were mentioned, it was not observed that the agency’s budget is the same for magistrates and government employees.

Considering the association’s plea in favor of the magistrates, the court remained silent on the situation of government employees, who have the same right. But the administration can rectify this shortcoming and correct the procedure.

The union board emphasizes that there will be no moral or legal basis for discrimination. According to the budget, law and enforcement regulations, the average per capita values ​​are determined, without distinguishing between magistrates and government employees. “The health of a judge is not more valuable than the health of a server. We demand at least equality.

Most of the judges ruled that the verdict would be correct, but there were no details on how it would be implemented. According to the CNJ resolution, the value threshold covers the holder and his or her final dependents, while the current support provides individual and abstract values ​​for each associated beneficiary.

The union does not accept the assumption of unequal treatment and has filed a petition seeking that the court extend the civil service to any amendment that may apply to magistrates, in relation to the values ​​of the time. I will call him without any reduction. The category of mobilization against someone as you exclude it.

In addition to valuing the SUS, which is underfunded by governments, the Center has historically defended the increase in health budgets in the courts, stagnating benefits and increasing spending with health plans. In view

This year, after a seven-year stalemate, the claim was partially accepted. The average per capita for the Labor Court was adjusted from R $ 215.00 to R $ 402.03 based on the National Health Agency (ANS) Index. This cost is the basis for calculating the budget based on the total number of users per body, and therefore does not necessarily reflect the nominal benefit to each individual. Although this adjustment has partially alleviated the situation, the union emphasizes the need to update aid, given that the money has been frozen for a long time and still meets the high cost of additional health care. Insufficient for

Maybe you like it too

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.